Even though I traveled this weekend, I still found time to play bridge online, and, speaking of diamonds, Kate and I bid to a nice 6♦ contract on this deal (hands rotated):
♠ K J
♥ 2
♦ A Q 8 5
♣ J 8 7 6 4 2
♠ 10 9 5 2 ♠ Q 8 6 3
♥ K J 9 8 ♥ 7 6 4 3
♦ 7 2 ♦ 9 6
♣ K 9 5 ♣ A Q 3
♠ A 7 4
♥ A Q 10 5
♦ K J 10 4 3
♣ 10
West North East South
2♣(1) Pass 2♦(2)
Pass 2NT(3) Pass 3♦(4)
Pass 4♥(5) Pass 6♦
All Pass
(1) 5+ clubs, 11--16 points, could have a second suit.
(2) Artificial inquiry.
(3) I have a second suit, diamonds.
(4) Mark-time bid, tell me more.
(5) Shortness.
When Kate bid 3♦, I was pretty sure she was short in clubs, so it looked like a fitter. (Therefore, the aggressive 4♥ bid.)
West led the ♠2 to the jack, queen and ace. Kate advanced the ♣10 won by the ♣Q. East shifted to the ♥3 won by declarer's ace.
A diamond was led to the ♦A to lead another club, ruffed by the ♦4. The ♦10 was led to the ♦Q and when trumps split 2--2, the contract was secure.
Bidding and making 6♦ was worth 12.06 IMPs and you can see what other pairs did on this deal here.
No comments:
Post a Comment