Would you get the defense right?

Playing online at OKbridge last night with Notzia, we bid to 4♥ with these cards:

                ♠ 7
                ♥ 8 3
                ♦ A K 10 9 8 6 3
                ♣ Q 10 4
♠ K 10 9 5                      ♠ A 6 3
♥ Q 6 5                         ♥ 9
♦ Q J                           ♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ 9 7 5 3                       ♣ A K J 8 2
                ♠ Q J 8 4 2
                ♥ A K J 10 7 4 2
                ♦ ---
                ♣ 6

I was the dealer with both sides vulnerable and opened 3♦. I'm not sure what the best bid is with the South hand, but Notzia bid 4♥, a reasonable shot.

West led the ♣9 won by East with the jack. He continued with the ♣A, and that was ruffed. Declarer advanced the ♠J which was taken by the ace. The ♣K was returned and ruffed.

Declarer ruffed a spade in dummy and cashed the ♦A K, discarding two spades. When the ♦Q J fell, he led the ♦10 and discarded his last spade. West ruffed, but now his ♥Q fell under declarer's ♥A K and the contract was made.

The contract can be defeated. At trick two, East can shift to the ♥9. Declarer wins and advances a spade. West has to win this and lead a heart, preferrably the ♥Q. He gives up his heart trick, but it prevents a ruff in dummy and an entry to the ♦A K.

Should West find this play? Would you find it?

Making 4♥ was worth 3.56 IMPs for our side. If we were defeated, we would have lost 9.30 IMPs, a huge swing.

The board was played 70 times. Ten times it was played in 3 ♥, twice in 4♣ and once in 4♦. The other 57 contracts were 4 ♥. You can see all the results of this board if you click here.