Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Short-stacking

After I was knocked out of the poker tournament last Saturday, I still had the itch to play, so I scooted over to the Goldstrike. I got on the list for Omaha-8 (one ahead of me), and I bought $120 in chips and sat down at the $1/2 NL hold 'em table to kill some time. (I normally buy in for $200 in the NL game, but this was the amount I wanted for Omaha.)

The third hand, I picked up A K. UTG limped and I was next to act. What would you do? I would usually raise, but I was out of position. Because I had just sat down, I had no clue about the other players, so I limped along. Another player called and the button raised to $18. The small blind called and the early limper called -- over to you.

I decided to play the short stack game and moved all in. Unless I'm against A-A or K-K, I don't mind playing this hand. If called in one place, I have some dead money to make it worth it. I have fold equity, too. Because I limped, then moved all, this sounds scary to others. Don't forget, I'm an older guy who looks pretty nitty. The beauty of a short stack is that I can only lose $120. I don't throw money around, but this won't change my life style if I lose.

Guess what? Nobody wanted to put $102 more out there, and I picked up a $60 pot.

Lair of Lucypher has a series of posts on short-stacking. You can read Part 1here, and Part 2 here and Part 3 here.

Ed Miller posted about what he called the short-stacker's bread-and-butter play here.

2 comments:

  1. Great move in Memphis. You didn't have a read on them but they couldn't read you either. Nice pot pickup. I bet they were wary of you after that push!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. what's cool about looking nitty is that this play would have worked just as fine if you'd picked up 75o.

    /j.

    ReplyDelete