♠ K J 10 5 4
♥ 8
♦ Q 9
♣ Q 7 6 5 2
♠ 4 ♠ 9 7
♥ K 9 6 5 3 ♥ Q 7 4 2
♦ K J 3 ♦ A 8 7 6 5 4
♣ 9 3 ♣ 10
♠ Q 8 6
♥ A J 10
♦ 10 2
♣ A K J 8 4
At my table, there were three passes to me (South) and I opened 1NT. My partner, Mette, transferred to spades and made an invitational bid which I accepted. Against 4♠ West led the ♣9. I won the jack and led a low spade. West ducked, I played the ♠J and the contract could no longer be defeated.
Today while looking at the results, I noticed that quite a few pairs defeated 4♠. Many of them led a club, hopped up with the ace of trumps and led a second club. I'm not sure how they knew to do that, and it certainly could have been very wrong.
I did see one pair that had a nice defense although with a different auction. West's online name was Ruth and East was ovrtrx. Here are the four hands rotated to make it easier to follow:
♠ Q 8 6
♥ A J 10
♦ 10 2
♣ A K J 8 4
♠ 9 7 ♠ A 3 2
♥ Q 7 4 2 ♥ K 9 6 5 3
♦ A 8 7 6 5 4 ♦ K J 4
♣ 10 ♣ 9 3
♠ K J 10 5 4
♥ 8
♦ Q 9
♣ Q 7 6 5 2
After two passes, West opened 2♦. North doubled and East raised to 3♦. Over that, South jumped to 4♠.
What do you think of West's 2♦ bid? I don't mind it in third seat where just about anything goes. Because of this, there was information exchanged. Watch what happened.
West led the ♣10. Because East-West had bid and raised diamonds, this looked like a singleton. The lead was taken by the ♣A and declarer advanced a low spade. East hopped up with her ♠A, but instead of simply leading a club, she made the thoughtful play of cashing the ♦K. When West discouraged, it was easy now to lead the club for the ruff. Nicely done! West cashed the ♦A and that was down one.
Making 4♠ was worth 6.12 IMPs while setting it was worth 7.15 IMPs for East-West -- a big swing.
There were wacky results all over the place and you can check out the wackiness by clicking here.
No comments:
Post a Comment