Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Am I a heretic?

Wiktionary defines heretic as "someone who believes contrary to the fundamental tenets of a religion they claim to belong to." But heresy is not limited to religion -- bridge players can be heretics too.

Playing on OKbridge last night, Kate and I bid these cards to 6.

Q 6 3 2
K 10 6 5 4
A
A 10 4
==
A K J 7
A K J 7 3
3
Q J 2


North South
1
2 2
3 4NT
5 5NT
6 Pass

Most pairs would not have our complicated auction. The 1 bid was artificial and promised 16 plus high-card points. 2 showed five plus hearts with nine plus points and was game forcing. 2 agreed hearts and asked for (number of) controls. 3 showed five controls where an ace is two and a king is one. After that South used Keycard Blackwood and gave up with she found we were missing the K.

Whether you made six or seven depended on which defender held the K. If the finesse was on, you can make seven of either major (or 7NT, for that matter). Otherwise, you would make six.

Do you want to be in 6 or 7. Conventional wisdom says you should be in six. Why? The slam was so trivial, that all our fancy bids were unnecessary. Even in a weak online field, 64 our of 71 pairs bid slam (61 pairs bid the small slam, three pairs bid the grand). Because of this, 6 was worth less than 1 IMP (.81 to be exact).

Bidding the grand was worth 13.01 IMPs, but if you bid the grand and went down, you would lose 17 IMPs. (You can never be positive, but Kate was fairly sure that the grand slam was on a finesse.) Therefore, you are risking 17 IMPs to win only 13 IMPs on a 50-50 proposition -- bad odds.

Whoa! Not so fast. I am a heretic and say the answer depends. If you are one of the stronger pairs, but are only having an average game, bidding 7 is a good shot to pick up a board, and get back in the hunt, so to speak. But if you bid seven, and it goes down, your average game goes downhill fast. So, I guess it depends on your feelings. Do you want to just play the best bridge you can? Do you want to try and win, or at least win some masterpoints? Are you playing with a student, with whom you want to get more pay dates? Would bidding seven on a finesse upset your partner? All of these scenerios might play into your decision.

One more scenario: You are playing in a major knockout team game against Meckwell (Meckstroth and Rodwll). You are pretty sure you are behind a little and there are only three more boards to go. Wouldn't it be worth being able to beat them, if all you needed was a finesse to win?

Are you a heretic or a middle-of-the-road person?

Are you wondering if the finesse worked or not? You can find out, see all the scores for this board, and find out more, if you click here.

3 comments:

  1. One more scenario: You are playing in a major knockout team game against Meckwell (Meckstroth and Rodwll). You are pretty sure you are behind a little and there are only three more boards to go. Wouldn't it be worth being able to beat them, if all you needed was a finesse to win?

    In the first round of the Spingold this year, we (the #106 seeds) were 19 IMPs down against Meckwell (& co) going into the last set.

    We bid a slam on a ropey 4-3 fit and another off two aces. The 4-3 fit slam came home.

    Only one of the aces cashes against the other slam, but the defence can cash the king too in that suit. Zia led the right ace against me, but then tried to cash his second ace rather than trust his partner's encouraging card - to be fair, Hamman would always encourage as he did not want a switch.

    At the other table, my team mate could WIN the match if they cashed the two tricks, as Meckwell were in the slam too. Unfortunately he led a trump (on a different auction), so we lost by 19 rather than win by 2 IMPs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a novice bridge player, reading through the bids you and Kate made, I thought you two were smoking crack. Then I read through the complicated bidding technique and I'm glad I don't play tournament bridge, lol!

    Good luck in the fantasy finale, but I think I'm going to need a lot more luck than you!

    -meanhappyguy

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Paul = Thanks for your post. What you show illustrates my point (I think). You aren't trying to do what will win the most IMPs in the long run. Rather, you are trying to do what will win the match for you (not always the same thing).

    Have you read the latest (January) Bridge World? They described your team as excellent players from the UK (or something similar).

    @MeanHappyGuy = It's down to us! GL, hey, let's tie. That would be $100 each, I'm just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete