We played eight boards, then redrew and played eight more. The process was repeated a third time, and we quit after 24 boards. In the old days, we would have played until 3 a.m., but we're older now.
The second round, declarer was in 6NT on this layout (low cards approximate):
♠ A K
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ K Q 10 9 8
♣ 6 4
==
♠ Q 7 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ A J 2
♣ A Q J 5
Declarer won the spade lead in dummy. He could see that if the club finesse worked, he would have 12 tricks. If it failed, he might have some rare squeeze, or he could finesse in hearts. Both hooks were off, down one.
Here are all four hands:
♠ A K
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ K Q 10 9 8
♣ 6 4
♠ 9 4 3 ♠ J 10 8 6 5
♥ K 7 2 ♥ 10 9 8
♦ 7 6 5 ♦ 4 3
♣ K 10 7 3 ♣ 9 8 2
♠ Q 7 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ A J 2
♣ A Q J 5
In the other room, the contract was the same, but declarer, Randy, was made of sterner stuff. He won the spade, and finessed the heart first. The hook lost, but when hearts divided 3-3, he had 12 tricks without finessing in clubs. We were playing for 10 cents an IMP, so this was worth a little more than $1 to me!
congrats on the cash...I guess. I didn't understand any of the bridge talk, except you won a buck. Well done!
ReplyDeleteThanks for dropping around, MOJO. That was one of those post I didn't expect anyone to recognize.
ReplyDeleteHow can I comment if you keep talking about bridge
ReplyDeleteInteresting how foreign all the bridge lingo is to me. I wonder if it is the same when I speak about poker and us terms like UTG, cut-off, OESD, button, etc.
ReplyDelete